It sounds to me as if you support the 360-hour threshold.
How do you square the circle to different communities that we have seen with high rates of unemployment? There is one example that I have used often. A fish plant owner—there was 12.9% unemployment at the particular time this was being quoted—is still looking for 20 temporary foreign workers because he cannot find a sustainable workforce to work in his plant. I understand you are saying, essentially, that people want to get back to work, and I certainly agree. I've been there, and I've seen that myself. How do you not establish chronic issues with temporary foreign workers being needed where there are high rates of unemployment? How do you square that circle?