What I mean is that in the positive sense is that we've uncovered that the issue of food security in the north is very significant and complex. I believe the expectations on the program, when matched against the size of the food security problem, tend to result in criticisms that could be placed in other parts of government or agencies that could be playing a role in solving the issue of food security.
The program has had its detractors because of this, from the scale of the problem, I guess, of the larger food insecurity question, but I believe we have good, strong evidence to suggest that the program has been working the way it was intended and making the impact we had hoped it would make.
I would finish my answer by saying there is an ongoing issue with respect to transparency of the program that has surfaced through the Auditor General's report and through others, to ensure that the subsidy dollars that are being provided are going directly to reducing the cost of food. We have been addressing that throughout the program.