I'd support some of that. Speaking from a northern perspective, I think there's an economic gain. This was mentioned by others and I brought it up briefly in my initial comments. I'd support that as long as we can see that there is an economic reason for those subsidies and that it would actually pay off, not just in making properties better places to be, but also, from a larger standpoint, in encouraging people to move to these dynamically growing communities. Typically, it's hard to attract people to such communities, and it's certainly hard to attract people who are in lower-income situations but are looking for opportunity.
If we can argue that doing this would bring those people into communities like mine, cause those people to be likely to come here to fill much-needed employment positions, and make it attractive for them, I'd support that, yes.