I think the issue with any carbon tax is that there would be so many layers of costs built into the lifestyle, and certainly there would be an impact to low-income people.
Just from the 30,000-foot view, my comment would be that I'm not a fan of carbon tax in general, and certainly not in areas like this. First, it affects the industries that feed and clothe people here, and which people come to work for either directly or indirectly. Second, the cost of transportation, the cost of building, and any kind of additional levy that goes into that becomes almost a layered cost and builds on incrementally in each step through the supply process. As I said, it probably decreases the likelihood of investment in the area and the natural resource industry in general.