Thank you.
I appreciate the testimony but I think the most relevant part is on pages four and five of the deck. The previous pages, considering the announcements of the budget, are likely no longer relevant.
Some of the comments made were that there were incremental, increased program costs by moving it to 15 weeks, possibly being taken all prior to delivery. You were making your presentation en français, so maybe I misunderstood it, but I thought you said it would be more expensive to do it that way because of incremental program costs and the additional weeks of benefits. That's how it was translated.
If 15 weeks is 15 weeks, and if you take those 15 weeks and move them around, how would they amount to additional weeks of benefits?