I'll suggest that first we need better measurement.
I was fortunate to be part of Minister Duclos's Miami Herald efforts with the poverty strategy and got to attend that conference last week. Our first challenge is just having a good measure of poverty.
We see that seniors are not keeping up with the working-age population's living standards. The general measurement issue—I wouldn't even call it a concern—is that as the economy grows and people are better off over time, if seniors are saving to maintain their own standard of living from when they were working and to be included with their peers, they're always going to lag behind the next generation. That's a conversation to have in and of itself.
I think what we need more, now—and this is also thinking of Ms. Fennell's comments—is to develop a better measure of poverty that's very applicable to seniors specifically and that allows for regional differences in housing costs, in what is available at the provincial level, in in-kind benefits, in the differences between being in the north and being in the south, and these kinds of things.
These are some of the bigger issues.