Yes. It would be a simple amendment. It's a fiscal cost to do so, to have the program grow at the speed of the economy rather than the speed of prices. The actuaries who look at the OAS and GIS system show, and they've been saying the same thing for decades, that in the long run, because this program is indexed to prices rather than wages, it gets cheaper and cheaper as a proportion of our economy over the long run. There are demographic ups and downs. We're going into one now where there is a bit of an uptick, but the long-run cost curve of the program is still down because it's indexed to prices.
To me, that means we can afford increases in the OAS and GIS. I don't think Canadians should accept the idea that if living standards in Canada increase, we should leave seniors behind on that increase. I don't think that's a principle that Canadians would support.