That's understandable. Many people do that.
For urban and rural, we have different perspectives on the low-income measures. The measure we described to you today doesn't discriminate between urban and rural. It provides a single national threshold against which everyone is compared. For that reason, one might want to focus a little more on the trends, because you might be unsatisfied with where the threshold is placed for different population groups, but the trends should tell the story regardless of what the height of that threshold is.
We have other thresholds as well. For example, we have the market basket measure of low income, which is available for more rural populations. Analysts who are interested in looking at the differences among rural and urban populations can look at that measure, if they wish to.