According to the testimony the committee has heard, seniors who stay in their homes do not necessarily have to stay in a house that could be too expensive, that requires too many repairs or too much upkeep, or that would be difficult to adapt for an owner with reduced mobility.
The definition of “aging in place” has been expanded to “aging in community”.
To what extent is there a need or is it feasible to offer support options in the communities and neighbourhoods where seniors live?
What role could the federal government play to establish the necessary services for seniors who have to leave their home, but who could stay in the community if they had support?