Absolutely, I did hear the call, notably from the NDP, our colleagues across the way, about a concern that there weren't definitions.
I can tell you, as I've said publicly, that the intent behind not including definitions in the legislation was to reflect that harassment can evolve over time.
For example, even 15 years ago we would not have been able to consider cyberbullying. It was really an intent not to limit the legislation to specific forms of harassment and then having to open it up again when something new happened, but rather to deal with that through the regulations.
I'll be very interested to hear suggestions about how we make those definitions within the law, if that's the desire of the committee, in a way that is comprehensive and doesn't unintentionally eliminate the possibility of future types of harassment or violence.