Thank you to the witnesses. This has been really interesting testimony for me.
Certainly we all know that this bill is motivated by good intentions, but I'm struck by some of the criticisms of the current structure of it. Maybe just to put a fine point on it, I'd be curious to hear from Ms. Walker or Ms. Peel on this. If the bill were to proceed through committee in its present form without amendment, do you think we would be better off supporting it or opposing it at third reading?