I'm not sure it would be conflicting. I think what we would have to do at that stage is have a discussion around what the language was in that overarching definition. I believe that as parliamentarians you might want to hear from the stakeholder community around the specific language that's embedded. It could work. I don't know if it's normally the way we would do it federally, but it could work. I do think that there should be certainly a complete conversation at the front end around what the specific language would be.
On February 22nd, 2018. See this statement in context.