All right.
Maybe one of my colleagues will jump in; we'll see.
Let me start with this question in terms of the general environment around this legislation.
It seems to me that having new rules—potentially stronger rules, arguably maybe weaker in some respects, but in any event new rules—doesn't change the fact that some of these questions will be discussed and partially adjudicated in the public and in the media.
What happens when somebody either doesn't use the designated process, even a new process, and instead allegations are made in public against a company that is maybe represented here or maybe is not, or let's say an investigation is undertaken and a determination is made that harassment did not occur, or maybe the complainant isn't satisfied by the remedies, and then there's further public comment around that? How should companies respond to these kinds of public discussions? How should we all respond to them?
It seems that there's a legitimate concern when people hear these kinds of stories and they don't necessarily see other aspects of the process that may or may not have occurred.