I don't think we've consulted each other on that definition, but I think you will find a lot of commonality in the views, so that if we were to spend some time on it we could come up, along with other unions, with a definition that was agreed upon.
This is not something that is novel or new. There are definitions of harassment that you can find in many different contexts, and that also have been interpreted legally, so I don't think that should be seen as this great challenge, or something that's so difficult. There are many recognized and used right now in the federal public service; that's why we were suggesting the Treasury Board policy. That is used every day in the federal public service. I don't think we should be scared of a definition of harassment. I think intelligent minds coming together can come up with one that is widely accepted.