My apologies for interrupting, but my suggestion is that you might put your heads together and provide guidance to this committee, because this committee is going to be making a recommendation to the government and possibly amending the legislation as it is now, sending it back to the House, and then to the Senate. This will be happening again in the Senate committee. If there is a lot of thought, and you get consensus on what the definition should be in Bill C-65, I think it would go a long way to achieving what you want.
I think there is support around here if it were a definition that we could all support. Particularly if the witnesses are supporting it, then that would go a long way.
I do have a question for Ms. Peckford and Ms. Sutton.
My curiosity in having studied criminology and Corrections Canada, and visiting the different institutions from the Fraser Valley, Matsqui, which is a medium security, and then going up to Kent, and to Mountain, and visiting the different.... There is a dynamic, a feeling, a culture around each of these institutions that's quite different as you move around.
My question is, for people working in these different environments, is there a different level of sexual harassment? Does it breed a sexual harassment environment?