Thank you.
I wasn't going to ask about the whip, but since you made those comments, and since I've been here for 14 years, I can tell you that one of the first things you do is find out who the whip is, and you get a list of people who are looking for jobs. The whip's office has been very instrumental over the years if I am looking for staff.
To have the whip totally out of the equation if there is an issue may not be helpful. Maybe they aren't involved to the level they are now, but I think they still have to be involved because they are the gatekeepers of each party if there's a problem. They report to the leader if there's a problem. I think it's important to have the whips involved to some degree, but this will be up for discussion around this table.
I do have a question for you, though. It relates to people who have become victims of harassment, particularly sexual harassment, who are struggling now as a victims. There was a discussion. I think it was you who talked about providing support for victims and what that looks like.
We've heard from the House and what the House sees as taking care of anybody who needs help. Could you tell us if the help that presently exists is adequate? In some cases, I would guess that such a person may not be able to continue working in this environment if they are struggling and there are triggers that bring back that harassment assault. They are really struggling. Is what we have now adequate, or does it need to change? If so, how would you see it changing?