I think the purpose of the tip line is to give people an anonymous way to bring forward a complaint that was subsequently investigated through a disciplinary process. Actually, part of our concern at the Edmonton Institution—and again, I'm very limited in terms of my time on this file—is that the disciplinary process was used, in many cases, to investigate, and as a consequence, the normal rigours of a harassment process and investigation were not used.
In one instance, we're familiar with an indigenous woman who bravely came forward. She was an employee at the institution. She clearly documented a lot of her concerns. There was a disciplinary investigation. Then the people she alleged were perpetuating significant abuse were brought back to the workplace under the auspices of a disciplinary process, where she had no access to the results of the investigation.
I think, more broadly speaking, tip lines are really a response to crises. What we want with the legislation is a really good process from start to finish, so the last thing we need are tip lines. I think, obviously, that giving federal public service employees and now parliamentary staff access to the safety mechanism is so key, and that's that an investigation can be—