Yes, I would concur. I think it's crucial. We look at sexual harassment policies—not legislation, but policies—across the country pertaining to legislative environments. There are very clear definitions of what sexual harassment is and what it is not. I think they are very instructive, especially in environments where, in fact, there are some difficulties sometimes for individual women. I think ensuring there's a gender-based analysis plus of this bill will underscore some of those dynamics around young women not being confident that what their experience is—a singular incident or systemic harassment—is in fact grounds for coming forward and activating whatever the mechanism is.
We stand behind the definition. We think, though, that it would be instructive to do a five-year review, to ensure that five years from now we can revisit the legislation, look at some of the challenges and the successes, and improve upon it. Because it's groundbreaking, having that five-year review in place would be very, very helpful.