A good example might be the public service employee annual survey, which is not perfect, but it is a way of better assessing the day-to-day experience of employees across the public service. I don't see a reason why you wouldn't want to do that with parliamentary staff. Yes, there's more transition in and out, but it would seem to me that, annually, you could conduct a survey of parliamentary staff that assures their anonymity and isn't partisan driven at all, but gathers some insight. It's not perfect. I would also suggest that you talk in a more systematic way to your MP colleagues across party lines about how they perceive harassment. Is their own understanding of harassment evolving to align with the legislation as it will be adopted? I think those are two starting points.
On February 26th, 2018. See this statement in context.