I think, oddly enough, that actually does come back to definition in one way. The definition should be defining the different forms of harassment because there are very distinct categories. Now there may be a category that is more difficult to define or situations that may not fall under a very specific category: psychological harassment, sexual harassment, bullying in the workplace, bullying outside the workplace, for example. I do think those are important identifiers that should be tracked. Now how they're reported to maintain confidentiality will have to be a very careful consideration. I also do want to reiterate what was said by Nancy: continuously getting feedback from staff, I think, is going to be extremely important. Staff on the Hill, particularly, often feel left out of every process. That speaks to a larger culture as well, and I think including them in that process through surveys or other mechanisms is going to be critical to earning their trust.
On February 26th, 2018. See this statement in context.