Jason, it's wonderful to see you again in a different committee.
My first question is probably for all of you.
I had a conversation with someone who has a fair bit of knowledge on harassment legislation and was talking about the fact that Saskatchewan has had legislation for quite some time, and its unfounded rate is about 55%. One of the issues is that the definition is too broad. It goes to what you were talking about, Ms. Poirier, in terms of what harassment is, so that definition is actually too broad. It's resulted that the majority of cases coming forward are determined unfounded.
I think if we're going to include a definition in our legislation, we need to make sure that we get it right, that it's not too descriptive but also not too broad. Do you have any examples of where we could look to a good definition that sort of accomplishes all of those?