Thank you for that.
It's just because I believe it was mentioned in the evidence we heard last week that there had been some discussion, with the possibility of you holding that roster, so I just wanted to clarify if with you directly.
My next question actually comes from Ms. Thomlinson, who mentioned adding some flexibility as to when an investigation may go ahead.
I want to bounce that out to perhaps Ms. Beavers to start with. How do you feel about adding that in as a suggestion? It was that rather than requiring an obligation to investigate every complaint that someone had been made aware of, it would be done when it's appropriate. There was more specific language.