I would like to say something, Mr. Chair.
It is an interesting proposal, because it is consistent with the spirit of the definition that was just adopted, but it is a bit more specific. What I like about the proposal from my NDP colleague is that it adds the notion of an isolated gesture.
According to the evidence we have heard, MPs work in their constituency office and on the Hill, but also anywhere else that they exercise their duties. I think this clarification could be useful for the interpretation of the definition of harassment. For instance, it would clearly stipulate that while we are exercising our duties, whether we are on the Hill, at a riding office or somewhere else that we are working, our conduct and gestures, whether isolated or repeated, can constitute harassment.
I think that is a constructive addition to the bill.