The intention, absolutely, is to put in place timelines through the regulations. I think something to note—and it was the first point I made—is that part of the purpose in putting them in regulations is so that you can truly reflect the range of different workplaces that we have: ships, air, remote locations, those types of things.
The other thing we need to think about through the regulations is where there are extenuating circumstances that would need to be reflected. In some cases, a specific timeline may not make sense.
Finally, we intend to put forward proposed regulations for a timeline by which an employer needs to respond, a timeline for the appointment of a competent person, timelines for investigations, and so on and so forth. Certainly, through the regulatory process there would be timelines put in place.