You will recall that with regard to the last amendment put forward of a similar nature, having to do with the investigation, an amendment was brought forward by the NDP to open that up to a timeline that would be within regulation. This would allow your question to be answered. You weren't willing to entertain that proposal, and so I'm not sure that your question is being asked with sincerity in wanting to actually support the premise of this bill.
I would invite the officials to answer the question regarding the importance of a timeline and why we might want to consider putting limitations in place to stand up for the victim and make sure that he or she is granted a robust report and that an investigation be completed within a timeline. Is that important? Should we be considering this within this legislation?