Again, could the officials give us some feedback on whether this is a good idea? Before, you commented that timelines were a good thing, that they could help bring structure, stability, and accountability to the policy that's in front of us. With regard to the amendment that's being put forward now, would you say the same thing?
Would it be beneficial, then, to put forward a timeline pursuant to regulation, taking into consideration, of course, the point you just made that sometimes it can take a year or two for a proper investigation to be completed? Understanding that, could we put forward a call for the regulations to be considered? Is that a good idea? Does that add teeth to this policy? Does it help it?