Sure.
We had a ton of data that model very clearly that women are disproportionately affected by COVID. There's no question. Financially, physically, emotionally, intellectually—all of that—they are much more impacted.
We know that this is particularly so for women who are at risk of violence or who are vulnerable in terms of their attachment to the labour force, whether they are essential workers and their vulnerability is about getting sick or they are caregivers and their vulnerability is about not being able to provide that care, particularly since long-term care facilities have been really locked down.
Also, financially more women are either leaving the workforce in order to care for their children or are thinking that if schools do not return on a full-time basis in the fall, they will not be able to continue working from home remotely and home-schooling and raising children all at the same time—particularly those women who don't have other adults around to rely on or to support them. Definitely, women are disproportionately represented.
They're also disproportionately represented in the research. In a crowdsourcing survey, for example, more women will respond than men, so we have a really good voice of women in the data. Women are articulating that they're quite pleased and satisfied with the government measures that are in place. The “very satisfied” or “somewhat satisfied” ratings are at 76% at the federal level and 79% at the provincial level.