Yes. I think that's actually exactly the sort of flexibility we're looking for. I think we've seen that those investments, with the doubling in the funding, have been fantastic. It has worked. We see that many clubs—as employers—and many others are taking advantage of these positions. I think that's clear in the fact that we have some clubs that may not have filled their usual quotas, so the demand is there, and I think on both sides, both for employers and for youth.
I think the flexibility to take it through to February is a great recognition of the flexibility that employers want but that students are also looking for. In terms of what I'm hearing from a lot of students, Isaac is one example, and I hear from many others who are saying that they're really uncertain about how they're going to return to school, and they're uncertain about what their employment prospects look like through this winter season. They're looking at the fact that they may need to be working more, either by doing school work and working—they may be doing school work virtually—or they may decide to put off school work by a term in order to earn enough. I think some are looking forward to returning in person and are waiting for the moment when they can return to the classroom on an in-person basis.
From the clubs we've spoken to, that extension has been received quite positively, and also by other employers. I also think it's a model for how the program might evolve to become something that is a more year-round program, recognizing that it's not just for during a pandemic, but that it is how students are increasingly thinking about school and work.