Again, I do respect that if we don't have some sense of priority or scope, then everything is...and we can go into 100 different directions. But, again, I just want to reiterate that we will certainly be mindful of witnesses. I don't want to see testimony excluded later just because it didn't neatly fit into someone's box. Therefore, there are going to be some grey zones that we will all be respectful of, and those people can still come and have their say. If it doesn't pertain to the usefulness of the study, well, then, at least someone felt they were heard and listened to and it's a permanent record in the committee evidence. I'm just glad to make sure that we're not necessarily cutting out people who may not have a voice otherwise.
On March 12th, 2020. See this statement in context.