I agree with many of Adam Vaughan's comments. I think we have to be careful not to make the study too broad.
I also appreciate the comments about urban reserves. That's certainly a reality in Winnipeg and they're certainly looking at developing housing in urban areas. Some of the communities, including Peguis, have talked about developing housing. But I think we still need to be careful to clarify that. If we're talking about urban indigenous housing, maybe one specific stream in the study could be urban indigenous housing, including housing on urban reserves, but I think if we're just going to open it up to reserves, it would become an insurmountable study.
Certainly there are programs on reserve that are not available off reserve, and, although hugely underfunded, there already is a funding allocation for housing on reserve. I think Adam makes some really valid points, keeping in mind that I do want to acknowledge the gross lack of funding on reserve. I just think that because we are looking at a limited number of meetings, if we make it too broad we'll end up studying nothing. I think that could be a potential compromise. I don't know how people feel about that.