I just heard you change the timetables on the fly there, and I'm not quite sure how that impacts this. I think that this is incredibly important—don't get me wrong—and I'm more than happy to talk about this program and, hopefully, how successful it is, because it's critically needed, from what we've heard from the front-line workers right across the country from coast to coast to coast. It's just the timetable you've outlined, and my understanding as parliamentary secretary to the department is that you're not going to get good conversation, just in terms of how front-end loaded the timetable is.
If you remove the exact time and send it to committee, I'm sure we can work out exactly how to achieve what you're trying to achieve, which I think is full public disclosure and real-time assessment of the program. I think these are all great things to talk about. You know me, I love to talk about housing. I'm never going to stop you from doing that.
I just think, in terms of how it works with the rollout of the program, to get you the most effective information so you can have the most effective insight and the best questions possible and also impact the communities that you are speaking to so eloquently, it's a bit front-end loaded, but, as I said, the principles are absolutely fine. If we can get it to the subcommittee and come back to the committee with substantial times, also take a look at the Bloc members' meetings and take into account the estimates meetings, I think we can work this out.
What you're hearing is broad consensus around the principles of your motion. It's just the logistics that we're having trouble with because we don't have the motion in front of us, and it is a bit of a moving target now.