I want to again speak to the point that Ms. Falk and others have raised, that there is no prioritization set out in this motion. This motion simply sets out that all the studies and witnesses called by the committee would be reinstated without amendment.
The committee is free to set out its priorities by separate resolution, which then the committee will do. However, this motion itself doesn't do that in setting priorities; it simply reinstates what the committee has already adopted.
I'm sure that the clerk can confirm that, based on the wording of the motion, or the chair. However, as a former chair, that is certainly my understanding of how the motion reads.