I understand what Mr. Kent and Mrs. Falk are saying. I don't think these things negate one another. The first thing is that what was originally [Technical difficulty—Editor] was simply to bring back all the studies and all the calls for ministers that had already been passed. The first motion was not to prioritize anything. The second one by Ms. Young, as I understand, seeks to prioritize the indigenous housing strategy, which is one motion of many that were previously adopted by the committee. I think what my Conservative colleagues are asking for is also to prioritize the calling of ministers for the estimates.
Mr. Chairman—again if Ms. Young or you will allow me—perhaps we can amend Ms. Young's motion to say that the committee's two immediate priorities are to deal with the indigenous housing strategy motion that was just reaffirmed by the committee and to call ministers for the estimates as soon as they are available. Make those the first two things the committee does. I think that's a reasonable compromise based on the indigenous housing strategy being so important—of course we're going to have to line up witnesses for that study as well—and hearing from the ministers on the estimates.
I think perhaps that would bring a consensus from the committee if we agree those two things are the priorities of the committee.