Much to the same point as my colleague Mr. Housefather, I was just going to point out that this motion does not prioritize or limit us from prioritizing the different motions but really kind of re-enacts or reboots and retables the motions that were there before. From my recollection, many of the studies are still, and maybe even more, relevant given the COVID-19 pandemic, so we could revisit those.
Certainly the subcommittee functions to prioritize work to some degree as well. There are multiple opportunities, and I understand that the main estimates are already included in that list, so I think that deals with Mr. Kent's concern. It seems maybe we could deal with these in two separate issues, as two separate votes.