It is certainly something we have looked at and that we've even asked our members about. Again, they're sort of split on that, partly because if the government takes 20% back, like it once did, that's still going to come out of your taxes or in some other form. It's just a sort of shifting of responsibilities.
I think that if the EI system is going to be one that goes beyond just a job insurance program—it already is to some degree, in terms of providing parental and caregiver benefits—and if we're going to keep adding more to that, there is a good argument to be made that perhaps governments should be supporting some portion of the EI system if it continues to go beyond its original mandate of just being a job insurance program.