I don't want to raise it as a point of order, but just more as a reference, Brad brought up what was passed. As I'm relatively new to this committee.... Regardless of when the membership changes—and I've been [Technical difficulty—Editor] to sit on this committee—whatever has been moved in the past and adopted for the next studies, should that not take precedence? If not, what's the point of actually voting and agreeing to something that may change in future committee meetings?
I would ask you, Mr. Chair, to maybe report back to us on what has been approved by the committee in past meetings, and if there are other studies—whether from the NDP, the Bloc or what have you—that have been agreed to. Those should set the order of committee business.