Thank you, Mr. Chair.
I appreciate Mr. Turnbull's remarks. They were about 20 minutes long, so I appreciate the in-depth research and arguments he has made in favour of his motion, which he brought forward in October, I believe.
However, my understanding is that the motion was not unanimously agreed to. There was no vote on that; it was just tabled. My concern is that this committee has unanimously agreed to other motions, which should take precedence, particularly given that a number of those motions are focused on COVID-specific issues that are happening right now and that need to be discussed and addressed.
While I'm happy to talk about social finance, I know the provincial government in Manitoba has done good work with social impact bonds. I'd be very happy to have that study at some point, but given that we've unanimously agreed to other motions, I think those should take precedence, particularly the ones that are focusing on current COVID issues that are happening to people right now.
I think Mr. Turnbull has really made a 20-minute long argument. We've heard that, so I would move to adjourn debate on his motion.