Wow, life is good today.
We all understand that the seniors' study, the topic of the motion we just passed, becomes the next study. The motion we will be debating later will be on minimum income and may be the second study. My main concern is that I don't want these two studies to take precedence over the studies we have already done, the rural, urban and northern indigenous housing study and the review of the employment insurance system. As part of our work, we are adopting a motion on another study, but first we need to have completed the reports on the two studies we have done. In other words, just to be clear, the order of the studies is not: seniors, minimum income, indigenous housing and employment insurance. We must also respect the work we have done and set a goal of doing everything we can by the end of June to have it completed. I am concerned that Ms. Falk's study spans six meetings.
After all that, we could discuss the next study topic of minimum income.