Thank you, Madam Chair.
The purpose of my motion today and what I'm looking for is transparency. I'm open to a friendly amendment to take away some of the information on pricing, but I believe Canadians have a right to know the list of projects.
I'm not asking for a lot here. I am asking for information about who applied, who was accepted and who was rejected. The basis behind that is that one of the applications from my riding in the St'át'imc Nation was rejected, and I don't think they received adequate information.
The second reason refers to my earlier testimony. With the mayor of Burnaby and chair of Metro Vancouver Housing indicating that despite Burnaby being one of the least affordable places in Canada, they receive no money for shovel-ready projects in that community.
I'm prepared to hear a friendly amendment from Mr. Vaughan to take away maybe the price point of that information, to make sure we can stay within the bounds of privacy. Ultimately, I'm just asking for which projects were accepted and which were rejected. I'm not asking for the world here.
Thank you, Madam Chair.