I would add that this creates dichotomy.
The government said it wanted to help the neediest people, as expenses were higher for those aged 75 and over. However, the wrong approach was used. The reason is simple: when old age security is increased, a claimant can receive that higher pension until their annual income reaches $77,000. So the wrong approach was used.
If the government really wanted to help those who need money and were in need, it should have increased the guaranteed income supplement.
That is why we are saying that a general increase must be provided, and not only for those aged 75 and over. Otherwise, two classes of seniors will really be created.