With respect to funding, what is required is the means to be self-determining. I want to be clear: the thing that is required is the means to be self-determining and to be able to undertake culture-based approaches that are not necessarily tied to the market.
Take the case, for instance, of the Ontario Aboriginal Housing Services Corporation. A range of options is provided by that corporation: rent geared to income, subsidies, and also programs that allow people to purchase their own houses. There is a specific program that allows women fleeing violence to purchase the housing they're living in. There's housing built specifically for that purpose for people to get into the housing market.
Market-driven approaches, however, are not necessarily going to be the ones that allow us the greatest flexibility to meet the needs of the community, because the need is so great.
Ontario housing markets are like those in B.C.: they're bonkers. It is thus more important for us to engage in approaches that emphasize affordability as well as flexibility and self-determination. That would be my answer.