I think what a national approach would allow you to do is bring different players to the table and, if done properly, allow everybody to have a voice, which would mean that smaller players or housing players in rural or remote areas would not be necessarily overrun by the Ontarios. It would, however, have to be equitable, because the interests of places where vast numbers of people are living also need to be adequately represented.
The advantage of a national approach is that you can build something that brings people together to address things properly and simultaneously to break it out to meet specific needs.