Currently, under the Reaching Home program, we have an indigenous caucus from across the country that represents the different community entities from across the country. In that scenario, there's a ready opportunity to provide block funding to that type of an agency to meet the needs on the Reaching Home side.
Clearly, there is a distinction between housing programs and homelessness programs. Those who are providing housing don't necessarily deal with the issues of homelessness and the dire needs of homeless populations to be served. The 24 hours a day, 7 days a week care, the hardest to house of the populations, the supportive housing services that they need on an ongoing basis, they're quite different from the family housing projects across the country where you're providing merely a subsidy for someone to survive and function on a daily basis.
I support the fact that there should be a distinction between the two: a Reaching Home pot of resources that continues to go on a national basis to indigenous organizations in urban, rural and remote communities; and a pot of money that goes for a housing strategy for urban, rural and remote indigenous communities.