Thank you very much.
I also ask the question from this perspective. Perhaps, Ms. Mackenzie, you've been following, at the federal level, that Mr. Poilievre has suggested that should the Conservatives form government in the future, a pay-as-you-go system would be implemented, along the lines of what Trump Republicans in the United States have put forward: For every dollar that is spent, a dollar of cuts has to be found.
What analysts, and in particular experts following seniors policy, have suggested recently is that while the policy sounds very simple, and therefore very good and very nice, it's quite the contrary. You would have a situation where things that are indexed to inflation—vital programs like OAS, GIS, the Canadian pension plan, generally—would all, by definition, count as a pay increase or, I should say, more spending would come from that, because, again, they are indexed to inflation. To offset that, you could have cuts in other vital programs affecting seniors, including dental care.
Is that something you're concerned about?