Thank you for the question.
I'm happy to respond on behalf of the Canadian Federation of Agriculture.
In our view—and not to repeat what Todd mentioned in his opening remarks—what we're proposing here is simply a balanced approach that would keep the lights on and maintain the movement of what we think are very necessary products in Canada—the food that we eat—when there is a labour disruption.
It doesn't undermine the integrity of the collective bargaining processes by preventing a return to full capacity, but it does, at the same time, allow for a means of keeping some minimal level of service and the flow of agricultural goods.