Ultimately, the concern is that this bill, as written, could further embolden unions to walk away from the table and result in a greater incidence of strike action, and even more disturbances along the supply chain.
British Columbia and Quebec, where greater restrictions on the use of replacement workers have been enacted, have experienced more work stoppages than most of their counterparts, including the federally regulated private sector.
Canada’s SMEs, the people they employ, the communities they serve, and the economy they contribute to do not need more work stoppages.
Overall, 73% of our members with an opinion said that they would not support a ban on replacement workers, and 92% supported having federally regulated workplaces that are instrumental to the supply chain be defined as essential services.
Thus, the CFIB opposes the adoption of this bill. We continue to recommend that workers instrumental to the supply chain be deemed essential, referring them to binding arbitration. This bill needs to be thoroughly reviewed. We are happy to answer questions.
Thank you for having us.