I will add that people from Videotron could tell you about the work that's being done outdoors during the dispute.
Delocalization is definitely a much bigger problem than the anti-scab bill because we can't put the burden of protecting employment in Canada on workers' shoulders. Once they've summoned all their courage and decided to stand up to their employer, this bill must not permit the use of subcontractors. If they're working outside, we can't know if the amount of work being done is increasing or not.
We have recommended that existing subcontractors not be permitted to continue working during a strike or lockout precisely because employers may plan to increase their subcontracting volume before the notice to bargain is given.
As for inspections, we think it's important to have access to information so that we can have the evidence we need to pursue remedies. Quebec has an inspection system that we think works well and that should have been incorporated in the Canada Labour Code. It appears in parts II and III, but it could also be included in part 1.