Thanks for that answer.
I'll follow up with another reference you made in your opening statement. You talked about how the use of replacement workers not only undermines the collective bargaining process but also creates a sense of resentment and can lead to violence.
I referenced in the previous two meetings the United Steelworkers' efforts in the 1940s when they fought for a 40-hour work week in Hamilton with Stelco, as well as their fight for paid vacation days. When 2,000 scab workers were brought in at that time, bricks, bats and other things were used with police and the company representatives. For decades, those stories were told in the city of Hamilton in relation to the company's actions and the people who went in as replacement workers. It can create labour relations issues for decades.
Can you talk about the importance, with this legislation, of avoiding those scenarios, which there are clear examples of? The longshoremen, who were here the other day, provided a similar story. I'm interested in your thoughts regarding the same.