You pointed out a number of deficiencies in the bill. I think you're speaking for many labour organizations when you say that, if the aim is to uphold the right to strike and prevent the use of replacement workers, we should prevent the bill from permitting that indirectly. As I understand it, one of the flaws that you're pointing out concerns all the personnel that could be used on an exceptional basis in the event of a strike or lockout.
Ms. Hokiro, you represent some workers at Telus. I know this is off-topic, but we know that alarm bells are going off in the Canadian government over the decline in the number of good jobs for workers in Quebec and Canada as the company delocalizes those jobs outside the country.
I imagine the same situation occurs during a strike or lockout in the telecommunications sector, as is the case at Vidéotron, when a company delocalizes out all jobs and brings in replacement workers.
Do you think that should be prohibited?