Unless I'm mistaken, the bill provides for a timeline of 90 days within which to be heard. We think that number should be reduced to 45 days for the process to be closer to reality. That obviously influences what will happen at the bargaining table and whether the parties will even go back to the table. Going back to what I said earlier, the idea is to maintain a balance of forces. If the employer is found to be in violation of the anti-scab legislation, someone must render that decision, the employer has to be informed that it must stop what it's doing, and it must be determined whether the parties will return to the bargaining table or proceed differently.
So that has to be done as soon as possible. The sooner the decision is made, the more realistic it will be, which is better for everyone, both employer and union.